I’m a big fan of NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams and think that the whole NBC News operation does a great job, particularly with international reporting, and not only during times of great crisis. But I was wide awake at 4:30 this morning, very upset (seething really) over a 31-second piece that aired last evening.
After devoting (as they should) most of the broadcast to the events in Japan, Brian came back from a break to report on the four New York Times journalists missing in Libya. Please watch this 31-second clip:
Just how long would it have taken to name Tyler Hicks and Lynsey Addario? There was an on-screen graphic with photos and last names of the four during the report.Even if you’ve never seen their phenomenal work in crisis and war zones, a quick Google search would make it abundantly clear how talented they are and the honors they have received for their photographs.
So at about 5:30 AM, I went to the Nightly web site and posted a comment (first time I’ve done that), letting them know that this was, in its own way, a very discriminatory piece of journalism. I’d very much like to hear what you think.
DIS-patch (n.): An official report from a correspondent (usually sent in haste)
Like just about everyone else, I've been riveted by the current events in Cairo. But my interest goes a bit deeper, because for a number of years in the 1970s, I spent months each year based in Cairo, shooting stories throughout Egypt and all over the Middle East. Cairo itself has always been a chaotic city, requiring tremendous inventiveness just to exist there.
At the time that Cairo was my base, there was no easy telephone service out of the country, and fax and FedEx barely existed; only telex — which, depending on your age, you may not have known ever existed. Sending a message back to New York meant a trip to the government press center, and a bribe to the late night operator (nothing new there, since virtually every single transaction with anyone in a position of authority required "baksheesh"). And in many ways, Egypt hasn't changed all that much. Poverty, overcrowding, unemployment, and corruption are still the rule, but mass communication and social media have put a new spin on this year's events.
Looking through a file of old telex messages produced this one that is a reminder of previous unrest. And after the story had been covered, getting pictures back to the U.S. meant going to the airport and finding a passenger or crew member travelling to New York who would carry a bag of unprocessed film to JFK Airport, there to be met on arrival by a courier on arrival. Interestingly enough, I never lost a roll of film to one of these helpful strangers.
When the current unrest began, some media reports referred back to the last widespread uprisings in Egypt, in 1977, over increases in the government-controlled price of bread. I was there for those, and though there was some tear gas in the air, a lot of rocks thrown, and a small number of people with guns drawn, it was nothing compared to we've seen in the past several weeks. Nor did the demonstrations back then bring down the country's president and government.
So here's to Twitter and Facebook, and a lot of very brave people (including journalists), with the hope that six months or a year from now, we'll see a lot of real democratic progress in Egypt and throughout the Middle East. The part of me that forgets his bad knees and shoulders would have liked to have been in the middle of Tahrir Square again; the sensible part will insist I wait a while and return as a tourist.
I was amazed a few weeks ago at the amount of front-page and network television coverage of the "End of Kodachrome." Dwayne's Photo in Parsons, Kansas, the last of the independent film processors (Kodak itself stopped years ago), finally ran out of the special chemistry used for both Kodachrome slides and motion picture film, and that was that.
I used to travel all over the world on assignment with a lot of film (sometimes hundreds of rolls), and Kodachrome was always the hands-down choice, at least until Fuji's Velvia 50 (which could be processed in E-6 chemistry) came into being. I remember shooting a big essay in Ireland and using my newly-acquired Nikon 300mm f/2.8 lens. Shooting wide open, the edges of everything in focus just jumped out in the viewfinder and later, off the page. I usually carried a larger tripod just to be able to shoot the longer exposure times required by the slower film.
But as the Kodachrome story played in media and blogs, I was reminded that there are other endangered species out there. And here's a story (and a tip) I want to share with you…
For decades, my shelves have held dozens of reels of Super 8 movie film that I shot of my family in the early '70s. The camera and the projector are long gone; the original 50-foot reels that we projected had been spliced together to make up 400-foot reels. And to show just how long it's been, Amanda is about to turn 42, and Tim just celebrated his 39th birthday.
And here I am, approaching 70, wanting nothing more than to see these very early home movies again and to share them with the kids and their families. The obvious answer was to transfer them to DVDs. I've known for a long time that you can take old movie reels to any number of photo shops, like Ritz Camera, and they will get the transfers made. But here's the sticking point — most likely, the work is not going to be done on the premises; the film will be sent somewhere, and with any luck, the film and DVD's will come back (or not.)
But I didn't want to trust to luck and the mail, so I called a young filmmaker whom I've known for a very long time and whose earliest movies were shot on Super 8. He immediately remembered that there are at least two labs, one in New York and one in L.A., either of which might be the answer. Since I'm on the East Coast most of the time, a trip into NYC was the answer, and that's how I found Pac Lab.
For that first exploratory trip, I didn't even take the reels with me; I just wanted to meet the people I would trust my film to. A couple of steps down from the sidewalk on East 1st Street in the East Village, Pac Lab could certainly do the transfers I wanted, as they are busy all day long processing Super 8 and 16mm color film. Some of the film arrives hand-delivered by the shooters (mostly young) who still make films (not 'videos'.) Some also comes in by mail from filmmakers all over the U.S. and throughout the world. I was interested to learn that much of their processing work comes from Japan.
At their suggestion, I returned a few days later with the reels of film and a small hard drive. The plan was to transfer the footage to the drive in DV format and then make DVDs from that. Soon, I had six copies and a hard drive filled with some absolutely wonderful memories and images. The disks were sent out across the country with instructions to hold off watching until Christmas so that we all could share the experience even if we weren't together.
Since the film reels were not marked by date, I had no guidance to give Pac Lab on the sequence to make the transfer. So until I have the time to actually do some basic editing of the footage on the hard drive, It's great fun to jump from learning to swim, to the 1973 Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade, to a Christmas morning early in the kids' lives.
So here's a great expression of thanks to Bryan Brown and his team at Pac Lab, and a vote of confidence in the way they got things of great value off my shelf and into our lives again.
I'm just back from San Francisco, a chance to see some of our dealers in the Bay Area and to spend the weekend with my son and daughter-in-law. In the course of a visit to Keeble & Shuchat Photography, in Palo Alto, I left the store with a Canon accessory that I've been wanting for a number of years but never knew existed.
Like many professionals, I have loved and worked with Canon's G-series for a long time. My first was the G2, and at the time it was an $800 camera and worth it. Now we're at the G12 with a price of around $400 and the swing-out, tiltable screen that was a feature of the G2 way back when. My current model is the G11, and what I've always wanted is the ability to use filters on it. Canon happens to have a perfect add-on, the FA-DC58B, which fits the G10, G11, and G12 cameras. What is also interesting is that this adapter is something I think thousands of G-series shooters would buy instantly, if not for the fact that its existence is buried deep within Canon's site. A couple of major professional dealers I mentioned it to had no idea it was even available. But I asked the right question of the right people at K&S and for less than $50, I've greatly extended the creative capability of what is already a great camera.
To use the adapter, just remove the ring that surrounds the lens (push the release button and rotate the ring a bit); then replace that ring with the adapter, which has a 58mm screw-in front thread, and add whatever filter you want, with no vignetting at any focal length. Even though there is a built-in 2-stop ND filter in the camera's menu, I often want to extend shutter speeds even more. So adding a 3-stop ND gets me just where I want to be. And if lens protection is what you need, a simple UV filter will work. I also find a lot of use for a Low-Contrast filter in landscape photos.
I mentioned the adapter to my friend and fellow photographer Allan Weitz, and within the day it was up on his very informative blog, fotoBistro.com. If you are shooting any of the more recent G-series Canons, it is definitely something you need to have in your kit.
How Do You Improve on an Amazing Product Like the LitePad? Give it Twice as Many LEDs, Add a Steel Frame, Universal Mounting System, and a Gel Slot!
Our longtime readers already know we've always been huge fans of Rosco's LitePad product. How can you not love a light source that fits almost anywhere, runs for hours on almost any power source, and weighs next to nothing? By the same token… how could you improve on something that was already so good? The wizards at Rosco Labs have managed to do just that, and now we'd like to introduce you to LitePad Axiom.
LitePad Axiom is a whole new class of LitePad. Designed specifically for the film and TV market, this more rugged and versatile product is a LitePad HO+ in a metal housing. LitePad Axiom has LEDs on all four sides and a “sunk” internal power connector. The extra LEDs mean your LitePad is now even brighter, while the slim-profile metal housing means your LitePad is now much more durable. The housing also enables you to quickly and easily mount the LitePad using one of the new Axiom brackets or by conventional LitePad mounting methods – even Velcro or rubber bands!
All LitePad Axiom units are available in either daylight or tungsten color temperature, and are built in various square and rectangular sizes from 3"x6" to 24"x24" (non-reinforced 3" and 12" circular LitePads are still available in the LitePad HO+ line.) The LitePad Axiom housing has a gel slot for color correction or other filters and is deep enough to hold more than one filter. On the back of the unit, there is a universal LitePad Axiom mounting system, allowing different Axiom brackets to be slid into the mounting system for various applications. For example, a 1/4-20 bracket could slide on for use with one of the new accessories or a Baby Pin could be used for attachment to a C-Stand. The new Axiom brackets will work with any size LitePad Axiom.
LitePad Axiom is meant to be a stand-alone unit; the housing was not designed for the LitePad to come out nor be taken apart. However, current LitePad owners can purchase LitePad Axiom conversion kits to upgrade their current LitePads to a tough new steel frame.
Get useful tips and tricks to improve your photos, whether you're a beginner or a pro. Check out our site, and if you like what you see, find a dealer!
RSS
Flickr
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube